• Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Punishing us for our thoughts is clearly established as the job of the church. This is a violation of separation of church and state.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They deported people in the past for leftist beliefs and also had their citizenship stripped from them for such…

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Where the fuck are the, “Mah rights!” people now that the government is actually trampling on the constitution?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “we’re pleased to announce that we have created the corporations from ‘Please Don’t Create These Netrunner Corporations’.”

  • LupusBlackfur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 days ago

    The two-page memo, which was obtained by the Associated Press, does not allege any criminal conduct by Khalil, a legal permanent US resident and graduate student who served as spokesperson for campus activists last year during large demonstrations against Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and the war in Gaza. Rather, Rubio wrote Khalil could be expelled for his beliefs. He said that while Khalil’s activities were “otherwise lawful”, letting him remain in the country would undermine “US policy to combat antisemitism around the world and in the United States, in addition to efforts to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence in the United States”.

    The Thought Police have officially arrived and been christened in their duties… 🙄 🤡 🖕 🖕

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s a school of thought out there where only citizens have the full rights granted by the constitution…

      Meanwhile there’s no such thing as precedent or rule of law…

      • Archangel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Constitution does not support that school of thought. It is very clear, that the rights it affords are universal and apply to everyone in the country. It says nothing about being a citizen or not.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          It does not. Neither does it support the legal theories that led to Jan 6. But here we are.

        • j0ester@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Tell that to the moron MAGA supporters. They keep saying that the US Constitution is only for US citizens, no one else.

          I guess they don’t know about, “WE THE PEOPLE”.

          • parody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You and I are the only US citizens. Those people faked their documents. They can prove it if El Salvador is willing to un-deport them.

      • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Don’t see the word “citizen” in the first amendment.

        Spoiler: even illegal immigrants are entitled to due process.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That “school of thought” is just flat-out wrong. The Bill of Rights doesn’t say what rights people have; it says what Congress cannot do. When Congress can’t do it at all, who it can’t do it to is irrelevant.

      • chingadera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        That school of thought would have to include the fact that if rights don’t apply, neither do laws, and being “an illegal” wouldn’t exist because those rights and laws no longer apply.

        It falls apart when you spend 0 seconds thinking about it.

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since we’re just making up rules now… New rule…

    Men with orange skin who are over 77 years of age and who happen to “have bone spurs” are now required to be greeted by a kick to their balls each time a new person enters the room.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    If ONLY he Said that Nazis LOVED Jews instead of STOP KILLING KIDS he would be a Free American!

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Being a Nazi is just a belief system, and y’all wouldn’t care if a Nazi got deported for being a Nazi.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’d care. As H. L. Mencken said:

      The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one’s time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t believe he was arguing that Mahmound is a Nazi. He’s noting that Trump, Elon, the far right etc… defend the hell out of Nazi’s and white supremicists with “I’m not saying I agree with it, but I’ll defend your right to say it, we’re free speach purists”, right up until someone with ideology that strongly opposes their views starts also talking… then it’s shut him up, get rid of him.

        • Kaboom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m noting that Lemmy in general is perfectly fine with deporting people for their belief systems so long as it’s shitty enough and in a flavor Lemmy hates. But there’s plenty of flavors lemmey loves.

          Lemmy loves communism, loves killing millions of people, especially Jews, loves racism, loves misgendering historical figures, I could probably go on. At this point, makes you wonder what Lemmy actually hates about Nazism, seeing as they love all the core tenets of killing Jews. Maybe it’s the fact they did the impossible and left their mom’s basement.

          In any case, y’all don’t care about deporting someone over beliefs, so stop lying.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              This is why I love the left. You’re all holed up in your silos and have no idea what the opposition to you actually believe. At the same time the opposition is actively expanding out so many people believe this sentiment and when the left are confronted with these things it’s shocking to them. Meanwhile these ideas have become common.

              There’s just no resistance to them spreading ideas.

          • Count042@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If your evidence of anti-semitism is the phrase:

            From the river to the Sea, Palestine will be free.

            Then you’re either delusional ( small chance ), or you’re anti-semitically trying to link all Jewish people with a state that the largest humans rights organizations have labelled an apartheid state.

            Why are you linking the actions of a state to a people? Are you trying to make those non-israeli Jewish people less safe by linking them to the actions of a genocidal apartheid state actively engaged in war crimes?

            Why would you do such an antisemitic thing?

            • Kaboom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              From the river to the sea means destroying Israel and killing every infidel there. Do you not understand their goals at all? It’s not hard to Google translate their charters and articles.

              The largest human rights org is the UN’s, and it has Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates as members. They’re not exactly unbiased.

          • parody@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            What’s your instance, is reddthat federated with hexbear?

            You didn’t complain about pedophilia so hopefully you’re at least defederated from that segment…

            Hey have you been screenshotting all that holocaust denier kinda lunacy (assuming like “[let’s literally] kill Jewish people [for fun, meet at the synagogue]” and not “arrest BN for war crimes”)? I’m bouta report ‘em soon as I see that BS - ppl should hang for genocide but obviously Jews are neutral at worst and awesome at best. (Reminds me I wanna watch Larry David, one of the planet’s funniest and happens to be Jewish… ppl might post his gifs here btw so it’s not entirely a jerk-off-Hitler platform)

            PS: sorry you’ve read calls to violence against innocent people

            • Kaboom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              I haven’t. Usually it’s stuff like this post, where the guy in question wants to kill everyone in Israel, Jewish or not, and Lemmy thinks that’s perfectly okay.

              It’s so infuriating, and it’s the main reason I wouldn’t recommend Lemmy to anyone these days.

              • parody@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Thanks for the reply.

                The guy in question

                Mahmoud Khalil, had to check. Where’d you read the “kill everyone”? Here’s my glance @ Wiki:

                That makes him sound limpdick af, so wanna read where you see your news (not facetious)

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                You’re going to continue to be infuriated and further isolated if you continue to argue in bad faith that the people that call for an end to an apartheid system are antisemitic…

                EDIT: Moreover, when I see people mad at people criticizing apartheid ethno-states, it’s generally because they are racist against brown people.

                If I followed your logic you would be, by definition, racist. And I would be publicly justified in calling you a bigot for your defense of apartheid.

                Kinda shitty, right?

                Maybe you shouldn’t do that?

                • Kaboom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  It’s anti-Semitic to want to kill Jews. And guess what group this guy runs? Cuad, which wants to kill 7 million Jews.

                  And how am I racist by my own logic? I don’t follow

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, cause in a nazis belief system I should be enslaved or killed. There belief system is an existential threat to me, so yeah I’m not gonna cry if they’re further away from me.

      Mahmouds belief system is only an existential threat to the apartheid Israeli state.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s not his belief system. He wants to kill everyone living in Israel, Jewish or not. Do you not know what “from the river to the sea” means?

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It means calling for a one party state with equal rights for all. You know, what non-racist people should want. Guessing from your bad faith lies about that statement, I’m guessing that isn’t you, though.

          One of the last arguments defenders of apartheid systems like to use is: ‘we can’t give them equal rights. Do you know what they’ll do to us? They might do to us what we did to them.’

          Last time I heard this argument was from defenders of Apartheid South Africa about the ANC. Whom they also declared were terrorists.

          You know, that racist shithole country whose final ally was Israel?

          Apartheid countries like to stick together, I guess.

          EDIT:

          Do you think apartheid South Africa should have fought to maintain apartheid like Rhodesia did?

          Why or why not?

          Were the ANC arguing to kill all white people in South Africa when they argued for an end to an apartheid state?

          How is that different from Israel?

          If you’re not an intellectual coward, you’ll answer these questions, even if only to yourself.

          EDIT EDIT: Holy crap you’re a human walking contradiction. Based on your comments you’re a pro-union anti-racist that is pro deportation without judicial process. You’re also transphobic and racist against Chinese people.

          You have no consistency to your ideological beliefs, like, AT ALL.

        • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          do you know what “from the river to the sea” means?

          Yeah, it means the same thing as a song I was taught in elementary school:

          From sea to shining sea,

          Let freedom ring

          It means let everyone in this land enjoy freedom. I suppose if your a cynical bastard you could say it means free of natives, but I don’t think that’s what the elementary schoolers, and everyone else who sings the song means.

          • Kaboom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Oh God no, what gave that idea? From the river to the sea means destroying Israel and killing every infidel there.

            Actually now that I think about it, from sea to shining sea did involve killing a lot of native Americans. That actually lines up.