Great news: your data would be siphoned to Xiaomi, not Amazon.

Lazily reasoned misanthropic nonsense, if every scientist were of this zero-sum mindset they’d all have long since transitioned to industry roles in engineering for the higher average pay alone.

Well, Wittgenstein, the question wasn’t posed to you specifically; most of us mortals have the decency to simply not weigh in on an open query that clearly depends on context we lack.
If you wandered into a class you’d never enrolled in and complained to the professor that you’d never met anyone named Boltzmann and didn’t think it appropriate to use the term “constant” in relation to something expected to change then I doubt anyone would feel spurred to introspection by whatever insults you’d gurgle up for them either.

If you don’t know the answer, you’re not required to respond. Armed with this new agency, please feel free to delete any reviews in the following format:

*----
“I NEVER ATE AT THIS RESTAURANT STOP MESSAGINE ME TO REVIEW IT”

Insofar as a once could call a polymer a very large molecule. Regardless, the statement that a single molecule bears any similarity to the DNA sequence of any creature is a bit absurd unless you’ve just discovered that life can be carbon based.

Molecules do not have genes.