- alphabet
- come
- in
- order
- the
- they
FTFY:
5. the
6. theThe alphabet provided ends with X. However, you apparently remove duplicates so maybe just cross out the last row?
Still an error unfortunately. Should be:
- the
- bart
- the
We really should stick with the orginal German verision.
- Die
- Bart
- Die
No one who alphabetizes in German could get a failing grade
First prize!
Now, a Goldener Irrgärtner question: where does ẞ go in the alphabet?
At the end after ä ö and ü
So this is in alphabetical order?
Stopp
stottern
stoßen
Styl
ständig
stören
symbolisch
südlich
Sütterlinschrift
süß
Zyklus
Ärger
One important skill for school is to look at the entire question so that you can understand what the teacher is asking for, even if they don’t format the question exactly right.
In this case, your answer would not fit into the 6 spaces provided for the answer.
So you have to ask yourself what they meant by “Write the following words”. Since “the” is the same word repeated twice, once you’ve written “the” after 5, then I could argue that “the” has already been written.
Therefore, if there are only six blanks for the answer, looking at the entire question, I argue that the answer I provided is most likely correct.
You’ll satisfy the teacher as often as possible and get good grades. I want to feel right as often as possible, which means I’ll disrupt the class often and get called out during the parents-teachers meeting.
Correct. It’s obviously supposed to be an ordered set, and that’s why there are 6 slots for 6 unique words.
I like how fox stays the same.
I like how pond is backwards.
Eirrv is such a better word for river that I’m retconning the English language
Feels like some new age Sindarin. I’m here for it tbh.
i wonder how many words are like that
I wish there were a free database of words to answer that question. :(
:(
If you’re on this sub, this is a good programming exercise for you if you’re interested. I’m sure there are plenty of large lists of words in English, that should provide all the data needed.
There are massive lists, the search is English words corpus
https://www.english-corpora.org/ is an excellent starting place
The question is poorly worded. It asks for words in the order they come in the alphabet. Words aren’t in the alphabet. Letters are in the alphabet, so they reordered the letters.
That’s not being pedantic, it’s just wrong. Do you not call the order of words in a dictionary “alphabetical order”?
Of course, but this is a 6? year old. Read the question as a child would.
Put the following words in alphabetical order
All fine, but if they don’t know the word “alphabetical” the clarification is…
(The order they come in the alphabet)
Confusing. “They” refers to the words and alphabet contains letters. If it had been “dictionary” and not “alphabet” then that would be clear.
Is that what was wrong here?
I like this kid.
Or autistic. Most definitely autistic.
OP already said programmer
Some become engineers.
With more than three repetitions of the same algorithm the kid should’ve been automating the process.
A clear indication of bad requirements.
Honestly the question as asked is unambiguous: “write words in alphabetical order” cannot mean anything else than apple, fox, log, pond, pumpkin, river. If what was provided here were the expected answer, the wording should be “write each of the following words with its letters sorted by alphabetical order”.
Could be understood as “take these words, and write them out in alphabetical order”. It’s not specifically stated whether letters inside those words should also be sorted or not.
We take it for granted that we have so much experience communicating, we can infer the meaning without full instruction, but children are still acquiring this knowledge and sometimes take things literally with hilarious results.
Of course, not blaming children for misunderstanding this; but if this were a software requirement, an adult software developer should be able to understand it correctly.
Completely misunderstanding the requirements? Yeah that’s a dev alright.
It makes sense if not taught the conventions of alphabetizing first. Kids don’t know what they don’t know.
Mr. Rogers understood this on a deep level.
QA prodigy
maliciousnaive complianceIn case anyways else looked for the comments to try to figure out what was done wrong, the expected answer would be: apple, fox, log, pond, pumpkim, river.
Seriously?
Are you asking if I was confused how they did something wrong? Yes.
Are you asking if “apple, fox, log, pond, pumpkim, river” was the intended answer? Also probably yes (but I didn’t make it, so I can’t be sure).
So you would have done the same as the kid?
I would have done the same right now as an adult.
As a child, I’d probably get from context what was actually wanted since it probably complemented in-class lessons. But in primary school, I also sometimes liked to push the limits of what was asked. So I might do this and also put what was intended to the side.
I was sent to the principals office several times in elementary school because my teachers thought I was trying to be a smart ass. Because I would do what they literally, exactly asked me to do, and not what they apparently meant.
I was always very confused because I honestly believed I was doing my best to follow instructions.
It didn’t help that I grew up in the American southeast, a region where patterns of speech are very indirect and lean heavily on idioms and metaphors.
I was in middle school before I figured out what was happening and did not get into trouble in that way anymore. I’m in my 40s now but I’m still a literal-first thinker. And yeah, I’m a programmer.
woah man, posting answers to tests online is cheating and can get you expelled!
No, the answer isn’t “pumpkim”. :D
Are you sure? Apple is crossed out (presumably as a hint to cross them out as you add them to the list)
Words.sort() Words.map(word => word.sort())Baby steps in functional programmings
Programmer? IDK. Looks kind of antigrammar to me.
An amateurgrammar, if you will.
I like it. He didn’t meet the assignment but he proved his knowledge. Now to see if they mark on knowledge learnt or subjugation.
They did fail to demonstrate knowledge of lexicographical order, which this exercise seems to be aiming for with the inclusion of pond and pumpkin, so I think it’s a bit cynical to consider failing the student on this a means of opression or subjugation.
Let me put it this way then. I wonder if they will give him credit for his knowledge because he proved he knows what “alphabetical order” is. Will he lose any credit because he didn’t follow, or misunderstood, the question? Will he be marked on what he knows or how he understands the query?
It’s elementary school. They’d probably just explain it and have them try again.
The child did not prove that they know what alphabetical order is, they proved that they know the alphabet.
This does not showcase intellect, it showcases a lack of critical thinking.
This is a neurodivergent solution. You can know everything correctly but without a properly defined problem, you go with your best assumption. People that think differently, assume different things.
Write the following words in alphabetical order (the order that they appear in the alphabet).
This is not a neurodivergent solution, this is simply incorrect — the instructions are clear. You can try to rationalize why it somehow is correct, you are also wrong.
You actually highlighted the problem.
Words means individual words, you would need to say “list of words”
Entire groups of people go through school systems being wrong even though they are right, this is an actual problem. It destroys children’s self esteem.
A few things:
Words mean individual words
Correct, we have another word called ‘letters’. As it pertains to this instance, when you take the letters of the word ‘apple’ and rearrange them alphabetically — they are no longer a word. Unless you would accept aelpp as a spelling of apple.
-
I sincerely doubt this is the first time this child has seen the term alphabetical order, I would be inclined to think the child is a clever smartass depending on the individual.
-
Either way, the situation is very simple to handle without breaking the childs self esteem.
‘I totally understand why you came to the conclusion you did, and you did write the letters in alphabetical order! However, the instructions say to ‘write the words in alphabetical order’. Try again, I bet you’ll get 100%!’
The child is most likely just wrong. Teaching them to think critically about their failures is not a problem. Treating them as if failure is some pit they need to forever keep from falling into definitely is, and not helping the child learn to navigate failure is infinitely more detrimental.
Edit: Nothing is more aggravating than being challenged by bleeding hearts who don’t have enough blood left for their brains. Especially when I take the time to break down why their misplaced empathy is wasted only to receive zero response. Cowardly behavior, truly — children will be left anxiety ridden and logically broken if exposed to your methods.
-















