Google recently open sourced Pebble and today, Repebble has put some of the watches up for preorder.

    • rhymepurple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I understand that the watch operating system is open source. However, it seems that the watch will connect to a companion smartphone app. Do you know if the app is a requirement and/or if the app will be open source?

        • rhymepurple@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It is not clear that this is the app that will be used for the new watches. I imagine it will support the new RePebble watches, but I believe that app was intended for the original Pebble watches.

          The thing that makes it so unclear to me is that this is a repo owned by the Rebble team, not the RePebble team. I do not know how much overlap there is between the two teams, but the RePebble team does not have any open source repos that I could find. Any mention of open source software by RePebble (including the OS) are links to repos owned by other teams, which is a little concerning.

          • Thurstylark@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The hand-wavy answer is: go check the code and find out, however that’s not accessible to everyone.

            The helpful answer is: The code is out there, and the launch date is far enough away that those who do understand it enough to make that distinction should have the time to do so before it ships, so time will tell.

            The Rebble folks probably are the closest to knowing, given they’ve been hacking on the current app for the past several years.

            My guess is probably not. The target audience probably wouldn’t be cool with it.

            Also, there are 3rd party watchfaces and apps that will be available, so that code will need to be evaluated too. So, it’s more complicated than a single yes or no.

      • Wise@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Core 2 Duo

        • 1.2" black/white e-paper screen

        Core Time 2

        • 1.5" 64 color e-paper screen

        Am I missing something?

        • Farid@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          The watch featured a 32-millimetre (1.26 in) 144 × 168 pixel black and white memory LCD using an ultra low-power “transflective LCD

          The problem is that e-paper is a category of displays, and some companies label reflective LCDs as “e-paper”. Which is subjective (and I personally heavily disagree with that categorization, cause then LCD clocks and Gameboys have “e-paper” displays, too).

          But in the comment I responded to it was said Pebble has “eink” display, which is categorically wrong, as that is a very specific proprietary technology, which is e-paper in traditional sense, like the ones in Kindles.

          • n2burns@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”

            • Farid@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              As I mentioned earlier, whether a screen type is considered e-paper is subjective. And in my opinion, reflective LCD isn’t a type of e-paper. You may disagree, but it’s not “categorically” wrong.

          • FireWire400@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Where exactly is that quote from? I had a look through the product page(s) and could only find e-paper being mentioned…

            • Farid@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Quote is from Wikipedia. You can see it’s the case for both models here:

              Besides, I own a Pebble Time watch and can tell you, it doesn’t perform like a typical e-paper. It has the bad viewing angles of LCD and screen goes blank when power is lost.

              • FireWire400@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                That quote is on under features on the article for the original Pebble, right? Might be that the Pebble 2 used a different screen; I can’t really find info on that though.

                Regarding the Time, I think the product page for the new Time 2 specifically says how the curved screen lens on the Pebble Time wasn’t that good.

                Edit: Found the quote under the Core 2 Time section

                Flat glass lens (less glare and reflections than Pebble Time family curved lens)

                • Farid@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  From the Verge article:

                  The first watch that Migicovsky and Core plan to ship is called the Core 2 Duo (not to be confused with the old Intel processor), which Migicovsky says will cost $149 and will ship in July. […] It has the exact same black-and-white e-paper display as the old Pebble 2 (technically a transflective LCD, if you’re curious)