A person, on the Gnome Issue, suggested that terminals inhibit sleep when there is stuff running in them.

Continuing from that discussion, I am trying to understand, at which point it would be desirable to implement said inhibition - terminal emulator, the shell or the program itself

Additionally:

  • We want to inhibit when running stuff like pacman, wget, cp or mv
  • We don’t want to inhibit when running stuff like htop, less, watch
  • ulterno@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It shouldn’t be required on systems that support the corresponding FDO spec, but I guess, that would be done when that was not implemented.