ikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agosystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netexternal-linkmessage-square135linkfedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down151 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1266arrow-down1external-linksystemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated successblog.tjll.netikidd@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square135linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareMonkCanatella@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoWhat do you mean by modular though? I assume there’s serious coupling amongst systemd modules that make “modularity” just theoretical
minus-squareFizz@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 months agoIts like 70 different files and not all are required. You can swap out parts of systemd like run a different init system.
minus-squareMonkCanatella@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoSure but I wouldn’t say something is modular just because some things are modules. LIke yeah you can swap out networkd, but how about journald?
minus-squareFizz@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 months agoI would. There are a lot of modules only a few have hard systemd dependencies
What do you mean by modular though? I assume there’s serious coupling amongst systemd modules that make “modularity” just theoretical
Its like 70 different files and not all are required. You can swap out parts of systemd like run a different init system.
Sure but I wouldn’t say something is modular just because some things are modules. LIke yeah you can swap out networkd, but how about journald?
I would. There are a lot of modules only a few have hard systemd dependencies