• ɯᴉuoʇuɐ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is implied that the “earliest indication” of pants is the sculpture on the right, which makes it even more silly. It’s not even ancient cloth that was preserved to prove the existence of pants, but a stone sculpture that showed a person wearing them.

  • wren@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    even if this is true, there are other, much cooler types of clothing than trousers that still cover your arse

  • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    oog not like pants. how oog get good wife if no show oog’s large testicles? how else woman know oog make good mate?