• data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        For one, it explicitly calls itself a “subset”; a subset is not the whole set.

        If we don’t want to go just off the pedantics of language though, then here’s the thing: it was forked a very long time ago, and both have diverged significantly, I think. It’s a bit like saying Blink (the rendering engine of Chromium) is WebKit; sure, Blink is a fork of WebKit, but the two are very different now.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I mean… obviously 8086 “x86” is more limited than modern x86. So obviously there will be reduced features and divergence.

          And by your logic, because it diverged 25 years ago… modern linux is…no longer linux.

          If you want a valid argument, its not GNU/linux since it doesnt use GNU tools…

          • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            To clarify, what I mean is WebKit continued while Blink became its own thing. Factually, Blink is not WebKit anymore.

            Replace “WebKit” with Linux and Blink with ELKS.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              And webkit is a fork of khtml.

              Noone is arguing forks are “their own thing” but we can all agree they are all derived from the same base and have diverged from factors such as solviing different problems or simply different developer methodology.

              They’re is no straight line. There are hundreds of linux kernel offshoots. Some are more tightly coupled with the main, some are highly specific to a single cpu architecture.