• Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Come visit Canada if you are nostalgic for toys r us. They still exist. Also in Japan I believe

  • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    I will never understand how leveraged buyouts are legal. I mean it somehow makes sense in its original form where workers were buying out the patron but now it is just weird.

    Edit: No this is actually fine if you think about it, it just feels wrong somehow.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You just described a situation that is not happening here. If you want to take on debt to buy a business, that might be reasonble. You, the person, BeeegScaaawyCripple, would assume the debt.

        Of course PE doesn’t work that way. The borrowers themselves are at no financial risk. That’s the point, that’s the scam.

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          that’s due to exploiting specific business structures. literally anyone can do that (e.g. five associates formed an LLC to buy the building they work in. the loans in question went to the LLC, not the partners), so i’m not sure why you’re saying it’s not what’s happening.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        They should only be able to use their own capital for the loan, not the company they are buying putting up the majority of the capital. That’s the problem with leveraged buyouts: you’re effectively putting the company up for liquidation when that happens, because the buyer is likely going to gut and shutter the company so they end up with a profit in the end.

        Ask Toys R Us about the process.

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I just feels weird that you can use the value of the company you buy to buy said company. It just “feels” weird that you can get a loan and use whatever you buy as leverage.

        Now that I am typing that out that is not really different from getting a loan to buy a house. Never mind, I guess it just seems weird when it is such an insane sum of money ¯\(ツ)

        • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          or like a dentist finishing dental school and buying someone’s practice. you get a huge fucking loan because who still has money after dental school

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Toys R Us still lives in Canada. She’s practically just as you remember her. And she’s happy. 🥲

    • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      2 of the 4 stores in Ottawa just closed and a 3rd one is going to soon. I don’t think Toys R Us is doing that well.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do we really need 4 physical stores in Ottawa, though? I mean yea it’s sprawled to shit but still. Looks like the Merivale is still going and it’s at least pretty central. There are plenty of other toy stores around as well, so the concept of physical locations, at least, is still cruising.

        • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Merivale is the one that will probably close soon. A few months ago, they sold the property and put the “store closing” signs up, but took them down when the sale fell through. I assume it will close again when they sell the property again.

          The only one that I believe hasn’t closed or tried to close is the St. Laurent one. Even the one in Gatineau apparently had closing signs, but I don’t know if they actually closed or not yet.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Dang, but it’s sorta fair considering how the area’s not thay dense. Ottawa will, I hope, one day understand that building large box stores away from customers just isn’t the play.

            But I live in Montréal now where mid-density is king and we got toy and game shops opening up across the street from other toy and game shops because customers density supports that kinda behaviour.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If 1 is profitable and 3 aren’t and it’s a matter of geography, that’s a sound business decision.

        What kind of a sane business model would benefit from holding onto (and paying taxes on) property/assets that aren’t profitable? 🧐

        • AspieEgg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, that’s kind of my point. 3 of 4 stores in Ottawa aren’t profitable is probably an indicator that Toys R Us (at least in Ottawa) isn’t doing that well.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      She’s practically just as you remember her.

      Except for the soft play area they’re adding. She’s enshittifying.

      • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You mean Jared Kushner who along with the Saudis that bought EA?

        Jared Kushner has a close relationship with Saudi Arabia, developing a strong alliance with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during his time in the Trump administration. Since leaving office, Kushner has had significant business dealings with the kingdom, including a $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund into his private equity firm, Affinity Partners. This relationship has drawn scrutiny from ethics experts and congressional investigators.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s time to actually mean it and stop buying from them. No, I mean it. Stahp.

    • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      It did once his dead switches triggered. Remember that tax bill that gave everyone tax breaks for four years then jumped higher than before? Ya, that was intentional.

        • Kraiden@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          :shrug: The EA logo might as well already be a big red stamp “DO NOT BUY!” Not like I could give them any LESS money

          • wurstgulasch3000@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think it’s funny that EA publishes on steam now because you can see how bad the reviews are for e.g. the FC game. Most people are obviously not happy with the quality of the games. But some still buy them year after year, for reasons that elude me

            • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Their base is casual gamers where it’s basically the only game they buy each year. The cost is very small in those terms, and they don’t want to be on the old version despite the issues.

              • SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                They really could leave the engine as is and sell yearly DLCs to update the team rosters… but this way makes more money, I guess.

    • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I asssumed they meant it was already shit, so cant be enshitifed further.?

      Challenge accexpted ?