Don’t hesitate to be more precise on what you didn’t understood. And say that you didn’t understood the context, not that there is none(, or that i’m a schizo, w/e that may mean, it’s a bit of an all-encompassing term currently).
I’m sometimes imprecise on purpose, but it doesn’t feel like i overdid it here, did you read the selftext ?

If you believe that my (rhetorical )question would be answered by opposing material conditions with the afterlife, then you may have missed my explicit mention of God’s kingdom, as well as the tweet mentioned ?
If i’m vulgar : what’s the point of all being wealthy enough if we’re also all assholes ?
The quote about our eternal thirst that can’t be quenched is infinitely more rich&eloquent.

I’m a theocrat first, and a communist second, a libertarian and other stuff as well, like in favor of a real/direct democracy, e.g. through sortition like in Athens, and don’t see an incompatibility.
So if you’re saying that religions deal with the Sky while secular institutions deal with the Earth then i’ll disagree.
A transition to theocracy should be progressive though, with many decades or even 1-2 centuries of cohabitation with atheists.
Worth adding my discovery 1-2 week ago that some venezuelan communes are very pious.

I don’t think that talking about it will be useful, nor do i aim to convince you.