• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Every other president had an increase. Every single one. Not even breaking a record, creating a new one by failing twice.

  • Astrophage@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 months ago

    And yet he has no less power… In fact I bet he has more than any other on the list thanks to the supreme court.

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Your system is so fucked. It took the Tories less time than it takes for a lettuce to go bad to oust the mad woman in the attic when she fucked our economy.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      In general the president has been gaining power over the past 50 years as congress has become more gridlocked and inept.

      Now we’re at the point where a president can bomb a foreign country backed only by the approval of his buddies in a signal chat.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Interesting that it is a very clear downward trend. Hopefully this is a sign that more and more people realize the two parties are failing them and are ready for a shake up.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I was actually about to make a comment that I think this is related to biased media, the 24/7 news cycle, and the need for outrage to get eyeballs for ad revenue.

      In the past I think people had their amygdalas left alone for the most part, at least for anything that wasn’t “be afraid of communism!!”

  • neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    What’s up with Truman, Kennedy and all those high numbers?

    Even if we assume Truman achieved 100% approval in the first 100 days, that’d mean his initial approval was 16%.

    I am going to be a bit skeptical of this.

    Mainly because I know that Kennedy was elected and not grandfathered in like truman and there’s no way he was only elected with only 28%

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is it possible that it’s % of variation compared to what it was on day 1? So if approval was 50% and on day 100 it’s 60% that’s +20 (20% of 50 = 10, 50 + 10 = 60)?

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think this is initial approval minus approval 100 days in, I think it’s approval 100 days in minus disapproval 100 days in.

    • notabot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Net approval at a point in time is the percentage of voters who approve minus the percentage of voters who disapprove, it’s not a delta from an earlier reading.

      For net approval to be negative, more people must disapprove then approve.