db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 months agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down15
arrow-up10arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 months agomessage-square27linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 months agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism