• _ed@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    To me making it free (without a paid version being available) is almost worse than a subscription. Before the onus was on making a competitive product to match adobe, with the revenue coming from this. Now you will get what you pay for.

    Merging the three products into one… Making the product free apparently will pull people from Adobe, but there is no like-for-like product, e.g. an illustrator replacement, indesign etc. It is all lumped in one product. This feels like shifting affinity to a consumer level product, rather than for professionals. Each product served a distinct audience (Photog/Photog Manip / Illustration, UI / Print Pre-press. With features unique to each. Why would a professional look to switch to a generalistic one-for-all product.

    I havent used canva much, but I have seen non-design people use it a bunch, this feels like the direction its heading.

    • EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      On the other hand Publisher already had a Designer and Photo Persona, so it kind of was already all-in-one.

    • Fedo ¶@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well ti be honest the all-in-one approach is what they were aiming for. Plus it allows a kind of workflow that I find more suited to current-day needs and habits in the context of graphic design projects. I mean, nowadays I’m finding the Adobe’s one app = one job approach pretty anachronistic and frankly annoying