not preachy at all, in fact I appreciate the factual presentation instead of it all.
fwiw, I’m not making any claim that the non-lethal first shot is a good way to go. only that I could see somebody thinking that scaring someone off without having to deal with the legal fallout of killing/maiming them is a good idea. was trying to discern somebody else’s intentions, not propose a plan myself.
not preachy at all, in fact I appreciate the factual presentation instead of it all.
fwiw, I’m not making any claim that the non-lethal first shot is a good way to go. only that I could see somebody thinking that scaring someone off without having to deal with the legal fallout of killing/maiming them is a good idea. was trying to discern somebody else’s intentions, not propose a plan myself.