• 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I’m genuinely baffled it’s not a several nines situation. I assume all road deaths involve cars

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Because the safety of X has nothing at all to do with discussing the safety of Y, so small minded people will gawk at how large a number 99.5% is, without ever even stopping to ask if it’s reasonable to compare those two things.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Because the safety of X [E-Bikes] has nothing at all to do with discussing the safety of Y [Deaths-from-cars] (I’m going to say this is “travel on public roads”), so small minded people will gawk at how large a number 99.5% is, without ever even stopping to ask if it’s reasonable to compare those two things.

          So, that’s correct?
          E-bikes are not the biggest threat to travelling on public roads.
          And the article says this. There is a growing amount of people that would rather use a bike or e-bike than to drive.

          And cars cause most of the deaths.

          Glad we agree