• hellinkilla [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I couldn’t read the whole thing cause it was so crazy but the substack in the other comment does have a hypothesis about the logistics. There is more details in the link but basically they think it was done via power bar?

    ES&S systems, including central tabulators and Electionware servers, rely on Tripp Lite UPS devices. ES&S’s Electionware suite runs on Windows OS, which automatically trusts connected UPS hardware.

    If Eaton pushed an update to those UPS units, it could have gained root-level access to the host tabulation environment—without ever modifying certified election software.

    I hope there is a talk about this clever attack at defcon or something.

    • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I mean thats assuming default behavior and no hardening on the OS layer.

      Still this is a super interesting attack vector and I would love to hear more about it. Here’s hoping we get a decent explanation at Defcon

      • hellinkilla [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I managed to hop through the rest of the substack. The author further speculates that Elon Musk can control UPSes from satellite using “lasers”. (Mention of which is a “breadcrumb” that those elites can’t help but leave for us.)

        DTC doesn’t require routers, towers, or a traditional SIM. It connects directly from satellite to any compatible device—including embedded modems in “air-gapped” voting systems, smart UPS units, or unsecured auxiliary hardware.

        From that moment on:

        • Commands could be sent from orbit
        • Patch delivery became invisible to domestic monitors
        • Compromised devices could be triggered remotely

        To support these ostentatious claims, they just have the graphs about how badly Kamala Harris lost. And of course the lack of evidence is actually evidence itself because of a perfect, error-proof “ballot scrubbing” technology; another hidden in plain sight clue. So forensic evidence is impossible. Hence the charts.

        Hope they demo this whole chain of events during their talk (or in court), that would be cool. It would be a lot more convincing than all these loser charts.