• burble@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Let’s just pretend the V2 ship design never happened.

    Hopefully the ground infrastructure isn’t too damaged.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly, if they just scrapped the ship, the booster would still be a brilliant win. Slap a normal second stage and payload fairing on that and you’ve got a rocket to pretty much anywhere.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Wow. When Ellen Musty said he would decommission the rockets, he really meant it.

  • ShadowRam@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    You know,

    Last time dingledorf made a mess, there was consequences/investigations by the FAA. Now that this has happened, what are the chances it will be investigated at all or any consequence of dangerous actions?

    I wonder what people will die as a direct result of SpaceX going all Titan Submersible now that they aren’t held accountable, because Elon got in there and gutted the FAA.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      there was consequences/investigations by the FAA

      That was a flight test. This was a ground test. Ground testing is not a licensed activity with the FAA, so they have no reason to get involved here. (Per Adrian Beil of NASASpaceflight)

      • ShadowRam@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh, yeah I guess that makes sense and is a fair point.

        But I still doubt SpaceX will receive any consequences for its reckless testing practices.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      tax payer dollars

      Not really. SpaceX are paying for these tests. While NASA have agreed to purchase Starship launch services for the Artemis program, they aren’t funding each test individually. The Starship contract for Artemis is fixed-price, not cost-plus. Whether SpaceX blow up one Starship or ten during the testing phase, NASA pay the same amount for the operational flights.

      • ptfrd@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Indeed.

        I assumed the comment was satirising one common form of misguided critique of SpaceX’s “hardware-rich” approach to this development programme. But yes, now I’m not so sure.