B.C. Premier David Eby defended his right to criticize court decisions despite organizations that represent lawyers calling his recent comments unfair and irresponsible.
“The idea that the premier should not comment, should not indicate any position on the court decisions, is patently absurd,” Eby said in an interview in his office. “I will continue to point out that I think the decisions are unhelpful.”
The Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia said Eby was “undermining public confidence in the justice system” and his comments “reflect a troubling national trend in which politicians use the courts as punching bags to score political points.”
It quoted association president Rebecca McConchie reminding politicians that the courts are part of a system of checks and balances. “The job of the court is not to be helpful to the government. It is to interpret and apply the law without fear or favour.”



Undermine the rule of law?
Wtf. No.
He’s literally going to change the law because the courts interpreted a currently written law in a way that wasn’t intended. And he should know, he voted for that law so he can definitely remember his intentions.
That’s well within how democracy works. He’s the fucking premier.
Can you sauce us up? From my readings the court noted that the land was never under treaty and the government unlawfully sold private land rights of land that was unceded.
Like me selling your house while you are on an extended vacation. Just because I did that, does not make it legal ownership.
Not sure which part you’re asking for sources on but:
Eby planning to amend the law: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/eby-dripa-gitxaala-ruling-9.7005087
Original law passage in 2019, with unanimous consent from all MLAs https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn/discover-your-legislature/2019-undrip-legislation-enacted#%3A~%3Atext=Visit-%2CMobile+Menu%2Cfuture)%20are%20consistent%20with%20UNDRIP.
David Eby was an MLA at the time: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_British_Columbia_general_election
Thanks for sauces. The mineral rights issue, makes sense. I was thinking it was the private land rights of residential areas that was recently creating a big stir