So general high estimate is trans people may make up up to 1% of the population. I’m going to estimate as unfriendly to us to be thorough.
So with a total of 2829 shootings we’d expect 28.29 of them to be by trans people and 2800.71 of them to be by cis people.
Now the more realistic answer is .3% of the population are trans and each of those 3 trans shooters has a huge asterisk next to the claims that they’re trans.
So general high estimate is trans people may make up up to 1% of the population. I’m going to estimate as unfriendly to us to be thorough.
:3 wouldnt assuming a lower % of the population as trans be estimating “as unfriendly” more than accepting a higher estimate? because that’d increase the % of mass shooters in the trans population. like if it’s an order fewer, than that’s already tipped the scale the other way. if its a third, then we’re well within the margin of error, effectively making it balanced out, each equivalent, easily arguably making this an utter irrelevant criteria, a non-factor.
gotta wonder about the socio-psychological duress, and the priming by false flagging agencies needing patsies, more, than whatever aspects of gender identity in psychology or physiology.
no time for pitchforks vs torches. the emperor’s naked.
![worrisome trend [OC]](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/f38e921b-f1eb-4b93-aa16-f42013fd7c8b.webp){kind=link}
So general high estimate is trans people may make up up to 1% of the population. I’m going to estimate as unfriendly to us to be thorough.
So with a total of 2829 shootings we’d expect 28.29 of them to be by trans people and 2800.71 of them to be by cis people.
Now the more realistic answer is .3% of the population are trans and each of those 3 trans shooters has a huge asterisk next to the claims that they’re trans.
:3 wouldnt assuming a lower % of the population as trans be estimating “as unfriendly” more than accepting a higher estimate? because that’d increase the % of mass shooters in the trans population. like if it’s an order fewer, than that’s already tipped the scale the other way. if its a third, then we’re well within the margin of error, effectively making it balanced out, each equivalent, easily arguably making this an utter irrelevant criteria, a non-factor.
gotta wonder about the socio-psychological duress, and the priming by false flagging agencies needing patsies, more, than whatever aspects of gender identity in psychology or physiology.
no time for pitchforks vs torches. the emperor’s naked.