Boise_Idaho [null/void, any]

rotato-chip Capital city of Idaho rotato-chip

  • 0 Posts
  • 121 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 8th, 2024

help-circle
















  • My impression from reading the NATOpedia articles on how the DPRK and Pakistan got nukes is that the government has to all-in when it comes to nukes since the government will face extraordinary amounts of international pressure, including other nuclear powers, to not nuke up. They will threaten them with sanctions, bribe them with food aid, even sabotage and assassinate scientists, but once the nuclear tests get detected on seismometers and satellites, everybody becomes fucking quiet.

    Pakistan’s PM Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto said “We will eat grass, even go hungry, but we will have our own nuclear bomb.” This is the amount of urgency the political class has to have in order for the country to actually get nukes. As soon as there’s a faction that doesn’t want nukes or wants to drag their feet, that country will never get nukes in time.



  • Interesting set of commentaries. They are incredibly harsh towards Iran, but from a realpolitiks perspective:
    https://nitter.net/PandemicTruther/status/1935021769762451584
    https://nitter.net/PandemicTruther/status/1934358798904541316
    https://nitter.net/PandemicTruther/status/1933980879996752224

    My comments assuming the massive long threads are true:

    1. The reformers have sold Iran down the river. They have done a whole lot harm, partially due to betrayal and partially due to general dumbassery on account of being useless libs. A lot of them need to be swinging from cranes, starting with this shithead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Javad_Zarif Seriously, go read the article. It has charming sentences like “Even though the United States did not make a promised reciprocal goodwill gesture at the time, Zarif remained committed to improving ties.”

    2. As soon as the West accuses a country of having WMDs, that country is now on a timetable. It has to get WMDs and turn the West’s otherwise baseless accucation into a self-fulfilling prophecy or it will be destroyed. I think Iran tried to pivot the accusation into a form of strategic ambiguity, but like everyone here has said, they should’ve acquired nukes by any means necessary.

    3. China will never militarily support Iran. That’s Pakistan’s job. China is the carrot while Pakistan is the stick. 80% of Pakistan’s weapons come from China after all, so any military action due by Pakistan should be understood (and is being understood) as a military action done by China. If China truly doesn’t want Pakistan to militarily intervene in Iran, a single phone call is all they need to get Pakistan to stand down. Any potential military action done by Pakistan against the Zionist entity would have been vetted and cosigned by China. I would not put it past China to officially condemn Pakistan should Pakistan intervene. But it’s all kayfabe.

    As an aside, I really hope they’re not some anti-vaxxer crank lol


  • Nearly half a million Chinese volunteers died fighting in Korea, without whose sacrifices the modern state of China would not have survived. Do you seriously think that Chinese people aren’t taught about their own history and know nothing about sacrifices?

    They died for the sake of China, not for the sake of Korea. I personally do not think most Chinese people would be willing to put their lives at risk for the sake of Palestinians and Iranians. Your outline of economic warfare by China against the West would almost certainly lead to reprisal against the Chinese people. If you aren’t convinced by the plausibility of nuke, there’s always sabotage. Blown up factories, bridges rigged with explosives, poisoned food supplies, etc. China’s internal security isn’t so great that a truck with drones can’t sneak its way in like what happened in Russia and Iran. The main difference is that Russia and Iran are fighting an active war with a populace that understands it will have to pay a human price while China is officially still a neutral bystander.