It’s has its place for sure.

But the physics are far more against satalite.

But the reason I don’t believe in large scale satalite systems for consumers is because they’re disposable. They all fall down or contribute to the growing space junk problem.

So it’s not really any better at the end of the day than just burying a fibre cable for 40 years.

Because building space ports and rocket launches have 0 impact as well.

But you acknowledge this, so what’s your point? Why pay a techno billionaire when we can publicly fund cables way cheaper and more friendly?

If we can figure out how to put them on the bottom of the ocean and pipelines over just about any terrain, I think we can figure this out

deleted by creator

I’m not saying your doing it intentionally.

Bur it is how it starts.

Edit the person I replied to didn’t use probably. Then you came in with a probably statement. That’s how miss information starts. People supporting bullshit with “probably”

A link to it will do

Do you? Because made up satistics are still made up.

This is how misinformation starts.

If your not sure, google it before commenting. For the sanity of the internet.

Not the person you replied to.

I mean that’s all good and fine, but it’s still off topic at best?

They’re valid problems to have, but no one here asked you to. Yours is a root comment.

It’s not an airport, there’s no reason to announce your departure.

No GDPR does not require google to display app permissions like that…

Your just making things up.

Are they? What law?