A fresh little ceasers with stuffed crust hits pretty good. Got a little heft and squish to it.
Domino’s just tastes like burnt cardboard to me (I think they use a lot of fennel seeds or something which I don’t really love imo) and always makes my TUMMY hurt… the Chicken BBQ is acceptable enough in a pinch tho.
This is the mythical purple voter that Democrats keep promising and swearing up and down exists in a meaningful capacity.
He will never vote for them anyways.
I felt this way about bernard glanders in 2016 I hope this person can get fast tracked to how I felt about him in 2021 tho it feels nice not constantly getting a 
every month or so.
I’m extra sad because I thought this post was going to be a pun about plant growth habits :<
Am I correct in feeling this way, or am I overreacting?
From what you’re saying it sounds like you’re completely in the right and framing this as “I’ve tried to work with him but he has only gotten increasing belligerent as time has gone on and he’s gotten used to me” you have a strong reason.
And if he’s putting you on blast to other RAs I’m sure you can include you overheard it and maybe whoever is in charge of that whole situation looks into things that way too idk. Also like you mentioned, not the first to quit working with him, thats a strong point in your favor too. Can’t imagine that goes unnoticed along with him making dogwater ass SlopCode.
Feels like one of those things that gets worse not better as time goes on. I’d 86 out of there. And if they try/suggest to have you work it out with him I’d probably call the bluff and refuse. Make it clear it’s really serious.
And the mod who gave him gold after every supervisor comment? Why his three girlfriends and, yes, they smoke weed.
Please god let this be true because it’s the funniest possible way for it to be true.
I’ll be the smugest pinkerton-made corpse ever to hit the ground just you wait 
What I think is meritous is more correct than them.
If anything, the Epstein file releases have affirmed to me that capitalism rewards people independently of societal merit.
…
Because what the FUCK are they even talking about here?
If (input.score == "Scary AI Takeover"):
Print(generate(library.ScaryAITakeoverModel))
GUYS NO WAIT GUYS!!! GUYYUZUHH!! GUYS LOOK! GUYS! WAIT GUYS! GUYS I SAW SOMETHING!
Not necessarily the point you’re at, question’s already answered, and I say this /with you/ not /at you/ (I can come across as aggressive in a written format sometimes so I’m trying to tone indicate more):
Like idk though for my money I’ve stopped labeling whole countries as socialist or not socialist---- kindaaaa. Nationalizing an industry is a socialist policy if you think that government is adequately derrived from popular consent, sure. That’s at least a form a democratic control of the means of production by one method in a certain way depending. It /does/ address that central contradiction of capitalism using a popularly controlled, democratic method. It /can/ be valid. (You see I’m careful wording this because I really don’t know a lot about Norwegian politics and I couldn’t say with any certainty how well it does that democratic/popular control part. Could be ass for all I know. The money from that oil could go to capitalists in the country or elsewhere and might not help those people. I can’t say.)
I’m not an expert enough on Norway and VZ to go further then that but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to say the electorate in both countries share a pretty similar amount of power from what I understand.
Like China I’d say is overall ideologically communist and has a market-socialist economy with varying degrees of central-demand organization.
Norway I’d say is ideologically liberal-capitalist but they implement socialist policies in their economy using market-socialist methods. They also do a lot of global hegemon stuff for NATO/US (iirc) which I would personally consider antithetical to socialism. If you work to oppress other people’s efforts to democratize their economies that, at best, makes you a hypocritic socialist (though you could argue they’d still be socialist none-the-less). It’s an ideology, not something we call someone when we think they’re the good guy (not saying you’re doing that but I’ve seen some people treat it like that before).
VZ gets tricky huh? The revolutionary communist ideology of Latin America is kind of a branch in and of itself, and Chauvismo a branch within that branch. They take more of an economic approach more like A Norway but in some aspects like A China as far as I know.
I think it comes down to analyzing the mode/attitudes of governance as it interacts with the economy. VZ (as much as one could say the following about an entire “country” with how nebulous of a concept a country is) fundamentally, ideologically, sees the economy as an extension of politics and popular demand. It understands the influence of imperial extraction in Latin America as an extension of capitalism-based phenomena and is more then willing to treat the market like a tool and not like an enshrined human right that’s as sacred as religion.
Norway does the market liberal thing and kind of treats the economy more like a Hellenic god or an invisible force. They have that western liberal reverence towards it even /with/ the policies they implement and they’re still attached to the American-based economic umbilical that feeds Europe (petrol dollar especially a part of that too I think yeah?)
I think that’s the closet thing to a label I’d personally put it at. You need the What, How and Why at a minimum imo. I think we put to much stress on labeling things broadly when they’re as complicated as an economy that’s woven into a global system 8.5 billion people large. Nationalizing oil is mostly a socialist thing to do. But the “country” or the government as a whole might be more attitudinally market-liberal or they might implement nationalization selectively and do different things with the money.
Personally though, gun to my head, I’d call VZ socialist and Norway Capitalist-with -heavy-use-of-socialist-policies mostly by factoring in the underlying ideological attitude and popular political currents. I don’t think I’d argue too much with anyone if they disagreed so long as we both recognize that both countries do nationalization and social welfare but they do it for different reasons and use the fruits of that policy in different ways. Mechanism Understanding > Labels to me I guess.
The US is a capitalist hellhole though. We at least got that one figured out.
Honestly you’re probably right. I hope at least that thing he did where he layed everything out that’s wrong with the system just to conclude that you have to buy into the system does something for someone at least.
Advanced bio-active payloads. Geneva-convention-violating type stuff.
Ooooo okay I watch him and TC and was thinking similar things.
MMM imo has clearly been getting more constructively radicalized over the year I’ve watched him and has gone more from “trump bad” to “I am actually putting the entire system on trial” lately so that’s cool.
TC knows some of the right terms and basically just opened the flood gates.
I feel like both of them are one Kyle Kulinski “never mind, I understand why they built gulags” moment away from accepting the spectre into their hearts 
Lathe: The United States enters into a democracy via online betting markets and the Democrats get suspended from office because they’re clearly getting paid to throw.
uhhhh if they like their cake, they can eat it.
-Baringle Obimgle
Oh hell yeah redistribute da Pepsi and Za
Imaging fusion energy powering food synthesizers which could enable china to convert crop fields into high-capacity carbon sinks using gene edited plants made explicitly for that task (there’s even a few start ups in the US doing research on that last part I know of).
Bleeeeeasssseee unfuck the plant bro I love not dying.