Begs the question, what are the parents to do, is being fined for something outside of their control justice? Or is it considered acceptable for parents to physically restrain their child to force school attendance?

Running Truenas as a VM in prixmox requires passing through the storage controller and blacklisting it from prixmox, so yes, you likely need the HBA.

Oh that’s nice. I was recalling figures that were released in the 24-48 hours after the election. Maybe there is a reason to have some hope.

As much as Feddit.uk does not mention it, in the 2024 GE more people voted for reform and the Tories than Labour and Lib Dems.

So Corbyn is arguably wrong, and the Labour government is actually only in power because of FPTP, and everything was already in place before Labour did whatever they have, or have not done.

Historically NFS and using one service per server was the usual process. “Builds on” means that the newer processes were developments and improvements to older processes. For example NFS was released in the 1980s and Docker in 2013. Obviously the efficiencies in docker and hyperconverged servers are the reason they have taken over most set ups, but it’s not obvious that software such as docker would have come into existence without the original networking processes.

…which is exactly my point. Using a VM or docker to run the relevant programs and using hard links rather than NFS shares is just a more complicated (but more efficient) setup that follows the same logic. It also has a more complicated network setup for VPN use than running a VPN client on an SBC. That’s why an SBC is the easiest way in to the lifestyle, before graduating to the more complicated yet more powerful setups.

A NAS, an SBC eg a raspberry pi, and NFS shares are the basic setup. Everything else essentially builds on this.

Well…yes? It is.

I’ll put £2 on a US court invalidating fines and a UK court placing a proscription on providers enabling access to 4Chan. Hell, if 4Chan got labelled as a terrorist website would that even be objectively wrong?

How is this any more hypocritical than a US demand of access to UK public spaces and imposition of USA law in UK homes, or the Chinese firewall blocking access to websites?

Regardless of the OSA, the concept that the USA can impose their bullshit in this country is abhorrent, and any government backing down on this will be viewed as feckless, now and forever.

Hoarding is the best plan for maintaining access to information, but not for interaction. Get used to being asocial.

In relation to 4chan, I can’t think of an easier scapegoat/opponent to use to justify blocking via ISP. And from a fines perspective…uh, that will be entertaining to watch, considering GDPR fines scenarios (not directly comparable but from a conceptual space)

deleted by creator

And this is why you should self host all personal data. I wish I had the capability and time to self host emails as well but can’t have everything.

It’s a change to private providers, not the NHS cost. The NHS cost has already been agreed (not sure for how many years though).

That’s the joke.

15% straight across, so will the EU be levying a 15% tariff on US imports as well?

Don’t split up a bonded pair, it’s cruel. How would you like it if you got locked away from a life partner and could never see them again?

Look up heat pumps.

Current guidance does not allow installation in a roof space, and limits capacity to 40kWh in most houses (80 kWh in detached or separate garage). Guidance, not law iirc.

But they are so heavy I would not place them on ceiling joists, I’d want them on a concrete floor

Time of use tariffs have low import costs than the price Octopus will pay for export, so it’s actually better to export solar production than to self consume, so your first advice is inaccurate.