OKRainbowKid

And you’d choose 40?

You don’t understand the intended message of this post. The people abstaining from voting because the ice cream is not vegan ARE the “both sides are the same, none will bring real change, that’s why I won’t vote/vote 3rd party” people that ultimately help steer the bus off the cliff. “Harm reduction” as used in this post is an argument for voting for the better of two realistic outcomes, even if that outcome doesn’t meet your purity standards. The point being that one option (bus driving off the cliff) is much much worse than the other.

So you’d let the bus drive off the cliff because non-vegan ice cream doesn’t fulfill your standards for ice cream?

Pretty accurate portrayal.

This gives me “old man yelling at clouds” energy.

I understood this reference.