boletus

I mean the difference is that a nazi isn’t a racial group or people.

It becomes a paperweight once you install the software updates.

Fair enough, as long as there’s respect to other dogs and dog owners. Many dog owners near where I live who selfilishly let their dogs off lead in busy on lead areas and obviously causes problems.

I’m willing to bet game pass will come to the steam deck. Also, that’s fair. Subscription models for tentative and unsustainable game series makes sense. My issue is more with normal games having to compete with game pass.

If it’s an off leash park it’s fine. If it’s on lead have them on lead. It isn’t about your dog it’s about everyone else’s dogs. Dogs on leash are significantly more reactive when another dog runs up to them, so it’s important to have control of the dog, lest one of the dogs gets badly hurt.

But why would you buy a game if game pass exists?

Its a complicated answer. It can play probably most modern AAA games. But it likely won’t be a great experience and I can only describe it as playable. If you want a very good experience with the steam deck, then use it for mid spec games or less and it’ll be perfect and have good battery life. If you want more then maybe try another hand held, or a console.

In the end the device you play your games on needs to do one thing well, and that’s to play the games you WANT to play.

If you are looking for an affordable device to play AAA games well on with no issues, get a ps5.

If you are looking for a hand held to play indie titles and the plethora of older games available I’d go for the steam deck.

I think it’ll be a while until we get a hand held experience like the steam deck but with AAA capable hardware.

Thanks for clarifying. Even more baffling why they’re doing this

Please correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this cheaper than their existing patreon subscription which is $5 a month? That would be $60 annually.

I’m still not going to pay for it when because I don’t think it’s a good practice in the open source scene but just want to put it in perspective.

Epic games is pretty anti consumer as far as things go anyway

Because his dad works for the company

Perhaps it wasn’t the best example, but the point I’m trying to get across is that almost any game you’ve played recently is likely profiting a bigot in some way or another.

Shareholders will always exist. Funding sources. Executives. Just because they didn’t write the code doesn’t mean they weren’t involved with the development. And they certainly make money off the success.

Of course always vote with your wallet. Just saying it’s a complex topic and it’s one thing to boycott it because Rowling profits off it, but you’re also excluding the hundreds of hard working game developers who put years of their life towards a legitimately good game.

Unfortunately, because of the existence of shareholders, pretty much anything non indie is going to be profiting off exploitative rich people with generally loads of prejudice against marginalised groups. Even indie games you’re kinda stuck, look at factorio for example. Or you’re supporting the storefront. There may be ways to consume games ethically maybe but there’s always a catch somewhere. Informing consumers of these choices is important, but judging them for it is reductive considering the only winning move is not to play.

Halo CE

The last AAA game you played is almost guaranteed to have been worked on by at least one racist, trans phobic, radical extremist of some kind. Just something to consider.

Bad feng shui

Why would you sign up to college to willfully learn nothing