No one goes to bat this hard for someone they don’t support.
Maybe the rest of the people here don’t know about Ethan’s long history of being a vile and detestable human being, but I have a good idea.
And no, I’ll never feel bad for, or side with, the pro-genocidal and open pedophile that is Ethan Klein.
To anyone else reading this, Google anything I’ve said, the receipts are available for everyone to verify.
Hello Ethan, I didn’t know you were on Lemmy.
Got to say, I’m not a fan, you seem pretty psychotic.
Although I guess you could be a h3 fan, but that might actually be even more disturbing.
Edit: I’m surprised so many people here are pro-Ethan when his biggest, and most vocal, issues are that Israel isn’t committing genocide, anyone who says they are is a Hamas agent, and that Palestinians are sub-humans.
He’s also an inveterate liar, racist, and has an entire account dedicated to making pedophile jokes on Reddit, about himself being a pedophile.
Go to conservative forums, all of the top comments are about how his politics don’t matter, lashing out at “the left” for pointing out his politics, or lamenting the fact that politics are even brought into this terrible tragedy.
I won’t hazard a guess at administrative/bureaucratic staff breakdowns, but you can bet your ass that the people who work inside the prisons, voted overwhelmingly for Trump.
Elect Democrats next presidential cycle and watch them do nothing to prosecute any of the criminal acts by agents of this administration, much less do anything to actually rebalance the economy.
Then watch them lose the following election and blame radical leftists.
This is the way.
That’s so 20th century.
21st century DNC is all about that sweet private equity cash and making land acknowledgments.
That’s my point, I don’t use LLMs for those operations, and I’m aware of their faults, but that doesn’t mean they’re useless.
So yeah, I look forward to the AI bubble popping, but I’m still going to use LLMs for type of tasks they’re actually suited for.
I don’t think many people on Lemmy are under the the spell of AI hype, but plenty of people here are knowledgeable enough to know when, and when not, to leverage this useful, but dangerously overhyped and oversold, piece of technology.
Ask the model to confirm the answer and it will correct itself, at least when I’ve tried that.
I’m sure there’s a mathematical or programmatic logic as to why, but seeing as I don’t need LLM’s to count letters or invent new types of pseudoscience, I’m not overly interested in it.
Regardless, I look forward to the bubble popping.
That’s not what I’m saying.
Giving people more, or better, health insurance, or raising minimum wage, are policies that the donor class feels comes at their expense. Either monetarily, or by giving the peasants more financial freedom, which they view as weakening their strangle hold on society.
They may have moral objections to marijuana, but enough of them also want to get richer off of it, so it’s not the same thing.
Pretty much everything is public on Lemmy.
Not an assumption…votes are public on Lemmy.
No, they down voted my comment and replied because they think they were correcting some mistake I had made.
Either bad English comprehension, or it’s not their native language.
What did I say to contradict that?
CTE and he only played high school football…
I found no record of him playing in college, much less the NFL.
Maybe he did other activities such as amateur or backyard boxing, but my quick search didn’t turn up any professional combat sports in his history.
The Democrats are structurally incapable of making any of those demands, except for legalized weed, as that does not improve the material economic conditions of the 99%.
Anything that improves material economic conditions of the 99% are policies that are violently opposed by their donor class, and the donor class always wins.
I remember not too long ago anyone criticizing New Labour in general, or Starmer specifically, would get lots of down votes and people calling you hysterical, or a conservative shill.
Er, I mean gee, who could have seen this coming?
I choose to believe that the superintendent in question was showing pornography to minors.
He was grooming them as part of their indoctrination into the fundamentalist Christian sect that he founded.
His ultimate goal is to create a harem of preteen girls who will worship him as a living God, and clean houses on the side, giving him all the proceeds.
Now, you may ask me for evidence to back up those claims, and my response is…Nah, that shit don’t matter anymore.
Red flags, they’re everywhere.
Was he not clear about that?
There’s even some in the room with me right now.
I understand the dangers this portends for us, and while I’m truly terrified of where this leads, I still don’t give a flying fuck about James Comey.
I don’t understand why using the state’s authority to intentionally and illegally destroy someone’s life isn’t being talked about as a capital crime.
If we’re a country that supports the death penalty, we might as well put it to some good use.
I understand why the agents of the state won’t talk about it like that, but I don’t understand why the citizens don’t start talking about it in those terms.