I’m confused, toner = laser. Toner is the media, it’s fine powder, applied to the paper via the drum and flash fused via a laser. Inkjet, liquid ink is the media, sprayed through a nozzle while moving back and forth.

Unless something about inkjet has improved in the 15 years since I was more inclined to know everything about them, the “goes bad” is what anyone with a brain should be focusing on. The first time you use a cartridge to print, it has a shelf life. It gunks up, prompting cleaning cycles that use dozens of pages worth of ink. If you only print a few pages a month, there’s a good chance you’re getting <40 pages out of that $63 cartridge.

I have a Brother DCP-7065DN, paid $64 for it in Feb 2014 (obviously a very good deal), page counter reads 3626. We’re on toner #3 including the starter, first was replaced in 2019, second in July 2025. Toner was $55 each.

I hope there aren’t people seriously advocating for inkjet printers for black and white anything. The only thing they are good for is photos, and even then you are paying more per print for a worse photo vs local print or online order options. That holds true even if you get good deals and somehow actually use the entire cartridge set without waste, I did the math a few times over the years. The only use cases are printing shit you’re too embarrassed to risk printer shop seeing, or is illegal/copyright, or you just like giving money to these garbage companies.

Maybe projects like this will change the math. I think if they targeted commercial print specifications it would be quite interesting. The jump to larger format printers is so expensive.

Ah, thank you and sorry, I should have just searched before posting.

Part of the issue is the quotes from Facebook rep saying they only do this with public posts, makes me wonder if its user error, platform lying, a bug, etc. but fuck all that. Any situation like this is strictly the platform’s fault, idc if the mother is mistaken and actually posted it publicly, if that’s possible then it’s bad design. Invest more in UX and less in user manipulation. If a parent was intentionally whoring out their children, we’d expect the platform to prevent that, not enable it.

I’m not trying to defend Meta, but where in the article does it say that private posts were shared publicly? I’m only seeing that public posts made by adults were used this way. The main rub is Facebook being accused of intentionally serving these publicly posted photos of children in school uniforms (by parents) as bait to join another one of their platforms. Like, a grown man was sent multiple advertisements where this was the exact content, no back to school pictures of young men, or any other type of photo. That they sexualized children algorithmically to bait men into using Threads, and are justifying it’s ok because the parents shared the photo publicly and didn’t opt out of the advertising settings (which seem to be a way to gain followers?).

One of the men was like, I’ve no idea why they keep sending me these pictures, I don’t engage with them. That might be an even more interesting story, because either Facebook is trying to offer sexualized children to uninterested men, or they know exactly which men are interested in sexualized children and instead of using it to push intervention ads, ban them from seeing the content their AI can definitely classify as enticing, or anything else, they use it to try to make more money.

I’m not saying you’re wrong for wanting that. In a perfect world we’d all be doing things we love surrounded by people we love. I’m saying this sort of shit isn’t going to turn coworkers into friends. If I think we’ll get along, I’m going to have a sense of that through natural means. We’re probably not going to get along anyway. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171/full

With rare exception, team bonds at big companies are superficial and these forced social situations aren’t going to produce deep bonds.

More to the point, I have work I actually want to do, and shit like this isn’t going to get it done any faster. Nothing you learn about my dog, kids, the weather, etc is going to make work faster, on the contrary the absolute best case is that we’ll spend more time catching up about non-work shit.

If management has time to think this stuff is a good idea, they aren’t good managers, especially if they manage anyone that has no interest in these things.

Feels relevant somehow, consider listening to act one of https://www.thisamericanlife.org/796/what-lies-beneath