Even if it didn’t happen, it doesn’t matter. I want the story to be true, and the hope that it gives me.

Monthly ACTIVE Users

I woudn’t ban people unless they are repeatedly spreading doom. Most of those comments are coming from all feed. Comment removal and a warning would be sufficient.

Hope is a choice, if a comment doesn’t indicate that they want a reason to hope or they refuse to hope I would remove that comment. If they want to hope but their doom is so overwhelming that they can’t even think about it I would leave it so someone could provide a reason to be even a little bit more hopeful for the future.

My propositions for different levels of moderation:

1. If the comment or post has purely depressive outlook at the future without real facts to back it up it will be removed.
2. If a comment or post including depressive outlook at the future doesn’t include question asking for a reason to be hopeful about something it will be removed.
3. If a comment doesn’t include a word hope it will be removed. /joke

I have just timed and 60 seconds wait time is atrocious for 8 text posts.

IPFS is nice but it doesn’t make sense for things that are under few of mb