• 19 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 4th, 2023
  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoTrans Memes@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Let's fucking gooooooo 🚩🚩🚩
    29·
    4 days ago

    we dont need tanks for that, just an underground network of lovely people, trained to turn hormone powder into meds for consumption, as well as a mutual aide network to finance the tools, powder, and production, and to distribute the product.

    if you wait for a violent insurrection to get what you need, you will wait longer than you can and once it happens you will just fall into the next authoritarian system because no libertarian system was prefigured.

    the meme looks lovely tho, politics aside :3

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoCurated Tumblr@sh.itjust.works•Middle schoolEnglish
    132·
    10 days ago
    worst joke this side of the

    lesbian? i dont get it. how does that work? like which one of you is wearing the black dress in the relationship?

    here i go explaining the joke

    its a stereotype that cishets ask queer couples silly question with the goal of squeezing them into the framework of heterosexuality. i saw a chance of putting a comical spinn on that by asking about the colour of the dress instead. the joke was very half cooked. my apologies @w@

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•average blahaj.zone comments section :3English
    1·
    16 days ago

    pha, you missed the nonbinawy kittens, meowing down here

    meow meow meow

    silly rambles

    technically ofc both of these chawecters could be nonbinawy, or be meant to include nonbinawy people. its just my silly gender bwain pwojecting gender onto them, which tbf is based on them usually being meant to wepwesent genders. >.<

    if they are not supposed to wepwesent genders but just people in genewal, then the cwiticism falls away of course, altho i could still cwitiqe the lack of diversity in appeawance.

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•dead plants ruleEnglish
    1·
    2 months ago

    you dont have to convince people based on dry theory. revolution does not necessairily mean a momentary violent insurection that overthrows what was. a revolution can be the process in which you create the structures you wish to see in the future, in the here and now. you then convince people by showing them first hand that it works and that it benefits them.

    here is a great video on how to construct the revolution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9K6ISx8QEQ

    it has a bit of a slow start, and feels academic but its very very insightful. absolute recomendation.

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Current method of Rule control
    1·
    2 months ago

    this is the first time i hear about that “trans people are for pam people” thing.

    i know some ppl consider nombinary ppl to excluded from bi, but thats just ignorance or exclusionary bs, that is not even in line with the ethemology of the word.

    i personally simply vibe most with the pan label, because it is kinda seperate from gender, which fits my fuck gender mindest.

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Current method of Rule control
    92·
    2 months ago

    ofc its not a phobia to have preferences. my critique is towards excluding people from certain labels of gender based attraction, for things other than their gender. especially if those people are systemically opressed for their gender.

    crazy example now, but sometimes that helps seeing things in a new light:

    if i say that im not into old people because i am a lesbian, then thats kinda messed up, because it implies that old women are not women.

    does that help?

    and ofc, because we live in a cis-normative society, many people dont often think about how women can also have dicks. forgetting about that isnt necessairily transphobic but might also just be a cis-normative oopsy.