Looks like the Ghostrunner developers also have an issue with paid mods running off their IP.

  • God's hairiest twink@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    In this case it’s cause the modder is charging money for the mod, I think CD Project Red even offered to allow it to exist if he stopped charging before this, so I would argue this is on the modder

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t understand what difference it makes to CDPR. if the guy makes a few bucks developing mods for the game, then he can spend more of his time developing the mod, and making mods for other games. right? in what way is it harming CDPR

      • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        2 days ago

        He always had the option of using a donate option instead of locking it behind a paywall. CDPR tried getting him to go that route and he basically told them to pound sand so here we are.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        2 days ago

        Property rights get all sorts of goofy when money is involved. If homey had released the mod for free and just had a patreon or whatev on the side, no one would care, but because he was charging for it, CDPR is obigated to vigorously defend their copyright.

      • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a legal aspect where if you don’t defend your intellectual property you may lose it.

        You also don’t want to set a precedent because if you let some rando do it, why not let a company do it? Why not let Google do it?

        Modding implies toying with someone’s IP, and the basic premise is that you can’t paywall the resulting product. There’s a lot of leeway and you can ask for donations, offer private beta to your patrons etc… it can definitely be cash-flow positive but a straight up paywall is a violation of the social contract that governs the modding scene.

        • [object Object]@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          if you don’t defend your intellectual property you may lose it

          Another day, another instance of someone confusing copyright with trademarks.

          • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            i was gonna ask for clarification cause the subject genuinely interests me but that Lemmy snark is so fucking boring, what a conversation killer

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Bit petty to point that out since it’s entirely irrelevant to the discussion.