It would tie in better with the email analogy, and it could show that they all just provide access to the same network.

What do you think?

  • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Go ahead. Try to force that upon Friendica that has called its instances “nodes” for almost 15 years now.

    Or Hubzilla that not only calls them “hubs” but also resists any and all cultural or technological influences from anything that wasn’t created by Mike Macgirvin.

    Also <insert Morpheus here> what if I told you that (streams) and Forte call them “communities”? You know, like Lemmy’s and PieFed’s “subreddits”?

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m afraid that when I say „my Lemmy provider” people will think I’m referring to my drug dealer.

  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Servers are a better word for it imo. It is what it actually is and average people already understand servers from discord

  • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was thinking the same. Provider is easier to understand, and used in daily life contexts.

    • I changed my Internet provider
    • This electricity provider offers better service
    • kubica@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      How would the word be used in our context? The Fediverse provider?

      But I think I associate the word with money related activities and I’m not a fan of that.