Welp…

  • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Now do another 10 or 20 parties more and maybe america could finally become a democratic country.

    • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think he’s THAT delusional. But he might be targeting the libertarian crypto fiends and techno-fascists that have gathered around the MAGA platform during the last election.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    How? I thought a prereq was to do a certain amount of philanthropy or action at the local level first.

  • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    194
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    “America Party”

    Americans really are the ultimate parody of themselves. Have fun with your civil war.

    • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      157
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hopefully it has success at breaking us from our failed two party system, while at the same time the party itself fails (and costs him lot of money in the process).

      • ExFed@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        85
        ·
        8 days ago

        We’ll need ranked choice (or some other voting scheme other than First Past The Post). Otherwise it’ll just end up the same as it always has.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          8 days ago

          Need new rules in House and Senate, too. The majority party gets majority in all the committees, gets to pick all the committee chairs, etc. All of the current non-D/non-R members ‘caucus’ with one of the major parties, making them de facto members of that party. A third party with enough representation to block the other two from gaining majority would almost certainly end up in an alliance with one, leaving us back with functional two-party politics.

        • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’ll gladly accept a reactionary centrist spoiler party into the mix. Especially if it coincides with the Clinton wing of the DNC losing its ability to maintain its grip on power.

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              The Dems who, since the shock of the Reagan revolution, swore off having a political project beyond “don’t make it worse” but accidentally foreclosed on making things better in the process. More recently, they’ve been heard saying things like “nothing will fundamentally change” in the face of a political situation that is very different from 40 years earlier.

              Basically all the powerful Dems since Bill Clinton. Groups like the Democratic Leadership Council. They’ll poo poo ideas that regularly poll at 80% support across all parties, then spend all their political capital barely carrying a compromise position with 48% support across the finish line.

              I really hope that we’re reaching a tipping point where people who believe in a better world and pursue policies to bring it about can have sustained political success

            • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Obviously, they’re nothing centrist about this guy (besides, perhaps, his perceived position in the universe). They are, in fact, reactionaries, so definitionally right wing. But they believe they are splitting the difference between the Stalinist left (exemplified by the NYT) and the fascist right (unbeknownst to them, them).

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        8 days ago

        Breaking the US from the failed 2-party system would require replacing first-past-the-post voting with at least ranked choice, if not a proportional system like Hare-Clarke, and probably scrapping the Electoral College altogether. Which may require constitutional amendments, or at least a partisan Supreme Court sympathetic to more democracy that would Chewbacca-defence it through regardless of legality.

    • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      8 days ago

      Best case scenario is it will split the right wing vote. In Canada, we’re used to it going the other way with conservatives taking advantage of a split left.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Washington Post columnists said it would probably just capture the “Never Trumper” moderate Republican voters who currently begrudgingly vote Democratic because they understand that the Republican Party is nominating only yes-men and fascists.

          • NateNate60@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            8 days ago

            Especially not their opinion column but I’m just posting here because it’s interesting to see what the neoliberals think about it and it’s a good discussion point

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Washington Post is Murdoch connected as of December 2023 (new leader and Bezos began to flex his muscles at the paper). I hesitate to call it neoliberal. It’s moved right of that.

              • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                If you actually bother to read it (regularly, not just once or twice on selected columns that you saw posted online), you would not think that. The opinion column is very neoliberal with a hint of libertarianism.

                • dragontamer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  I was an active subscriber who regularly read WashPo.

                  Ruth Marcus, Alexandra Petri and a whole slew of other liberals have left the post after the 2024 election and various tampering by Jeff Bezos. Or have you not noticed the change of writers yourself??

                  The ones who remained are hardly NeoLiberal, but overall have shifted farther and farther right. Jeff Bezos killing a few key OpEds have made it clear to the liberals that they are no longer welcome at the Washington Post.


                  Or what? You gonna try to convince me that Hugh Hewitt is a liberal or some shit?

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          8 days ago

          The Dems leaned hard on the never Trumpers for votes last year and you can see where that got them. Elon can have them.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          Republican never Trumper that doesn’t vote GOP is likely vanishingly small. They all fall in line.

          It might siphon off the GOP voters that begrudingly fell in line because they bought the Communist Kamala or something, or the ones that needed to see Trump disaster a second time.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Same with the USA, the US Green Party is funded by Conservative PACs such as Badger Values. If there were left unity then the 8 million people who showed up for Biden 2020 would have shown up for Harris 2024, but a lot of people are convinced the DNC aren’t left enough and that primary elections are shams.

    • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 days ago

      I want him to split the GOP vote. Basically just a Jill Stein that believes his own swill.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah…

      At best, it splits the MAGAt vote, making Dems a clear winner.

      At worst, it takes some GenZ dipshit votes away from Dems and causes chaos.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            Cut the age blame crap. They did nothing different than the rest of our society. Don’t let our generations fall for the same tactics as the generations before us. Our war needs to be a class war, not some stupid “young people are lazy nowadays” bullshit that EVERY high horse ignorant person has said for the last 200 years. Do the youth a favor and look upon anyone who singles them out and trys to separate us with disgrace. Respect is a 2 way street. Let’s be better

            • dragontamer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              You youngsters will blame the next generation as well. You just aren’t old enough to see the pattern yet.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think your beef should be with all men then. As Trump voters increased in men by age. So you could factually say Gen Z men were the least likely to vote for Trump as well

        • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          All/most of them, or a few mediagenic alt-right examples the press can trot out as proof of “young men want fascism and Latin Mass” when they run out of MAGA-hatted Ordinary Americans in flyover-state diners?

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          You should check those numbers, because it went 51% to Harris. Splitting that means good things for Dems though. Dilution through stupidity.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      If it splits the republican party and removes the old white billionaires from the dems than I’m 100% for it.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      Success means a split of the Republicans, because the vast majority of Dems aren’t going to follow Elon after these last few months.

  • nuko147@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    The America Party run by a South African.

    Popcorn is not enough for this country.

    • sprite0@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      of all the things to shit on him for this isn’t it. being multi cultural is the only culture we have and almost all of us are immigrants.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        White rich South African are devoid of culture just like every other rich profligate. They have no nation, creed, or ideals just an insatiable avarice.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          That’s not true, the Musk family have a rich culture and long history of…

          *checks notes

          Supporting white supremacy and trying to overthrow democracy in several nations.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        If it’s an insult to that crowd then it’s worth rubbing it in, and it certainly is.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’ll just point out the risk of what I’ll call “Joe Roganing” here. Elon pretends he hates both parties while there’s no election coming up. Then when the election arrives he “makes up his mind” and endorses Republicans. This allows him to 1) attract people fed up with both parties just to hand them to Republicans, and 2) have a credible that that forces Republicans to do his bidding.

  • buttnugget@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    8 days ago

    The funniest thing about stuff like this is that there are already a hundred political parties in the US. Every time someone says “we need a third party,” it reminds me of that xkcd comic about standards and protocols.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 days ago

      When people say that they want a third part I doubt they mean it literally, as in they believe there are literally only two parties, but rather I suspect they mean that they want a third party which is large and influencial.

      • buttnugget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Sort of. They usually mean it literally, but it’s rooted in the misunderstanding of the political system that most folks have. And I don’t blame them for this, I just find the grandiosity amusing.

    • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      That is a ridiculous comparison. More political parties are a good thing.

      • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        They would be, if the political and electoral system supported it.

        Which is obviously not the case in the US.

        • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think the opportunity is better this time around.

          Democrats and Republicans secured a two party system and locked everyone else out because of a few things:

          1. Finances and resources.
          2. Media coverage. During debates, they had secret handshake deals to only argue against each other, which forces media to only cover them.

          Musk got resources. He spent a lot to get Orange Man in power. And TV and news is already lower on the trust scale, as the population leans towards social media.

          There’s a few other issues like local/state elections that won’t be friendly to non-Democrat/non-republican parties.

          Of course, this is all a pipe dream and like the libertarian party, it’ll quickly get thrown aside and the politicians will fold into one of the two parties.

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Do you think there’s any chance that Musk can break whatever is formally boxing out other parties? It seems like just by being who he is right now in history, he could break things.

          We need to hope he breaks the current norm in a way that doesn’t put him in power, and opens things up for proper multi-party elections in the future. That’s a lot to hope for though, I guess.

          When I think about this, I can imagine Musk fans telling tales of his 4D chess moves and how his plan all along has been to overhaul and improve elections. Or some other bullshit.

          • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Outsourcing your revolution to the billionaire oligarch has to be one of the takes of all time.

            Me: Can we have Lenin?

            Mom: We have Lenin at home.

            Lenin at home:

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only good thing of that is that the otherwise shitty FPTP system will make him and Trump go for each others throat.

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s Musk so he’ll probably rebrand them as NaXis.

      Maybe enough MAGAts will join him that it will split the vote and it will get easier to get people with basic human decency elected. That is assuming we continue to have elections.

  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    How many weeks before he gets bored and abandons it when things don’t immediately work, just like everything else in his useless life?

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        He already bought himself an entire department with no oversight but got bored of it after a few months.

        • AZX3RIC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          In 1962, Congress created the role of “special government employee,” which allows the executive branch, the legislative branch and independent federal agencies to bring on employees for specific roles on a temporary basis.

          SGEs are limited to working for the government for no more than 130 days out of a 365-day period, though they can work multiple years, and they can either be paid or unpaid. NPR has reported that Musk is not being paid for his work with DOGE.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            He didn’t make it to 130 days. He never mentioned that. Also, the law does not constrain this administration. He got bored when he didn’t immediately become loved and gave up like the little baby he is. Stop giving these bumbling oligarchs the benefit of the doubt and a veneer of legitimacy. You are an active part of the problem when you do.

          • ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            If you’re just going to copy and paste from an NPR article, you might as well provide a link while you’re at it.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    What kind of shitty click bait is this?

    The richest man in the world officially announced on Saturday that he has officially formed a new political party to challenge Republicans and Democrats alike.

    He fucking tweeted that it was created, literally nothing official.

    • TommySoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      And when the president tweets it’s for some reason official and should be followed… We live in a really stupid age where the government and politics in the US is governed by social media.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        All it takes is for one determined furry to pull up their programming socks and hack into Truth Social and start posting under Trump’s name and we’ll see that dry up real quick, unless he wants to make all his official announcements surrounded by uwu’s and lewd pictures of Pokémon.

        Dollars to donuts it’s going to be stupid easy to do as well, because Trump is incapable of hiring competent employees or of paying whoever he does hire.