• SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    You know, I have tried not to get so much joy out of these since the election to avoid being lumped with libs or sadistic chuds, but I’ve got to admit, seeing them cry foul when Kirk was shot after spending months trying to throw people like me and my family into concentration camps, man, fuck them. I might as well have my satisfaction from slop posts like these. I’m only human and it’s pretty funny seeing them getting hit by their own imperial boomerang.

      • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        7 days ago

        Deep down I still feel a stab of pity. Trump would walk on a causeway of their corpses to get a Diet Coke. He’d complain the entire time about how lumpy and uneven they are.

      • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s the weirdest/best thing about all of this. On a hot mic on a livestream Trump could say “I hate my base. They are the biggest idiots in the world,” and within minutes the GOP would be scrambling to “explain” what he meant to the rubes. But later that day Trump could double down “Yeah - nobody hates my base more than me. But they love me whatever I do. They’re idiots. Absolute total idiots.” And then his base would say Trump is too good for them and they’ll try harder to get him to like them. Even though that’s an impossibility.

          • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            7 days ago

            “taken out of context.”

            I just realized that rightwing pundits say that or words to that effect too. And in polite company it’s a way to say “I don’t care. And fuck you too.”

            • SevenSkalls [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              It’s funny because when I imagine a left-wing person saying that but it’s followed by a 2 hour history lecture to fill in context, or paragraphs of text if it’s online. But when I imagine a right-wing person saying that it’s followed by a shrug and no further explanation.

              • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                a shrug and no further explanation

                That wasn’t always the case.

                Recently I watched a few minutes here or there of episodes of Firing Line with William F. Buckley. Before I looked for the vids I figured I’d have to watch random (very) shitty uploads from VHS rips. I was entirely wrong. The Hoover Institute uploaded high quality vids of the show to their Youtube channel. I have no idea how many. 100s? Maybe all 1,504 of them?

                The Hoover Institute is - of course - very old-school rib-rocked rock-ribbed GOP. They need an elaberate, tedious, complex network of rhetorical constructions for such things as why it’s a moral imperitive that the poor should be made to suffer, etc. John Kenneth Galbraith described it as “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy, that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

                After Dubya got elected and 9/11 happened - the rightwing started to realize all that fancy talk maybe wasn’t so important. Power is all. And Trump and Trumpism allowed so many rightwingers to go mask off, be openly racist, be openly hateful, and not bother at all with superior moral justification jibber-jabber. I shockingly large number of them is in permanent “Fuck you. I don’t care.” mode.

                • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Late reply I know but I love you for going back and subjecting yourself to Buckley.

                  I agree with everything you observed, I think you’re dead on the target, but you mentioning Buckley tickled a memory of mine watching the Buckley debate with James Baldwin.

                  Buckley tries a few times to deflect or deflate some brilliant point Baldwin is making with some quip that gets a few laughs but shows how Buckley thought and in hindsight look an awful lot like the kind of stuff chuds will get up to later. Buckley was smart, god curse his soul, he was a skilled orator, and he was well educated. But if you cornered him he’d pull a bullshit quip to get out of the corner. You see how he has to do it several times because Baldwin is smarter and keeps out maneuvering him.

                  Nowadays the chuds are all yowling hogs and baying dogs and they do that shit so often it’s basically breathing for them but you can see how originally it started with this basic phenomenon: right wing ideas are bad and eventually you run out of justification for them and you bluster and sputter and deflect. Buckley was just smarter so it took longer for him to get there but Baldwin could take him there, and did take him there, on camera in front of an audience several times. Meanwhile the modern chud, the failson heir of the Buckley birthright, has none of the education or the blue blood impulse to obfuscate the cruelty of right wing politics: they go from zero to sputter town in seconds.

                  Just something I noticed

                  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    I watched The Manchurian Candidate the other day. The original not the remake. It’s surreal to me that “brainwashing” has become real in the US. Chuds watch untold hours of rightwing news propaganda like Fox News plus similar podcasts and Youtube vids. They broke their brains. They no longer care what’s real or what’s true. Buckley was snide, rude, and could be a liar but at least he would debate issues.

                    Unfortunately I think a lot of liberals are like Axelrod and they have their own harsh and limiting blinders. They cannot accept that ~1/3rd of the electorate will be with Trump through hell or high water. The GOP can’t be reasoned with and debating them is idoicy. In fact - it’s toxic to do so because it normalizes awfulness. The chus exist in a world where they reject any information, fact, data, number that contradicts their cherished nonsense or propaganda.

                    Trivia about the book that is impossible to see in the movie…

                    The book’s title refers not to the brainwashed assassin Raymond Shaw, but to Senator Johnny Iselin, who is clearly a caricature of the anti-Communist demagogue of the early 1950s, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy. The basic premise of the story is that Iselin’s achievement of nomination to national office was the direct result of a Communist plot hatched in Manchuria, and Iselin is thus the “Manchurian Candidate.”

    • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, no, I’m past the point of caring.

      I don’t celebrate the misfortune of other average folks, but being an average folk myself, I don’t empathize with the leopards ate my face crowd like this person.

      Fuck anyone who is still going to bat for right-wing policy and then turning around and acting like they didn’t…

      Fuck all these people.