• AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t know how to feel about this. Assuming the facts of the case are as reported, both sides appear to be badly at fault, with the girl as the instigator.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      16 days ago

      The child threw a rock at a window. The window was broken. Call the cops. It is pretty simple.

      Three grown men chasing a little girl and assaulting her trying to cause grievous bodily harm by stomping on her head is nothing short of attempted murder.

      Assuming the facts of the case are as reported your take seems pretty damned hot.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 days ago

      Even if she did do it, you don’t stomp a childs head into the ground due to some broken property.

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              16 days ago

              both sides appear to be badly at fault, with the girl as the instigator.

              not said or implied ?

              • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                16 days ago

                Saying that all parties involved have done shitty stuff does not in any way imply they were all equally shitty. You added the equivalence part on your own.

                • Senal@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  I didn’t add anything. Look at my username.


                  In response to the rest:

                  It also didn’t imply the shittyness was unevenly distributed.

                  If that’s what you mean, say as much, then you’ll have no cause to be upset at other interpretations of your ambiguous statements.

                  Or not, you do you.

                  • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    15 days ago

                    There’s nothing ambiguous about a statement which made no mention or attempt at comparison of degrees of shittiness. The other commentor decided to come in and start an argument about an aspect of the topic which I had not touched on in an any way or form. They can sod off

        • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          16 days ago

          You are correct. What sends OP and me off, is that stating that when wrongdoings are so inequal, it can be perceived as equating one to another. I was thinking about posting my readings on that, and I wanted to highlight that, as quoted, cases would be followed on and judged separately, is a just way to do that. Girls aren’t relieved from consequencies, and these violent mofos aren’t either. And while that states just as much as your comm, it doesn’t sound any alarms.