https://youtu.be/xD4hfP1e6Zg

I had one back in the day which was the same load size as normal washing machine and had two modes of drying. First is like you say. The other, if you hook up an exhaust duct, dried clothes in the same time as a regular dryer.

Yep that’s totally true.

Worth noting as well that even if you can dish out for higher cost goods that alone doesn’t mean you escape these labor practices. Not only do you need the wealth to buy conscientiously, but you need the time and energy to investigate the supplier and their supply chain. i failed to read your whole post, blame the app 😅

The choice is often false, and that’s a systemic affect. The idea that the less well off are judged for making such decisions isn’t about ethics, it’s about class.

Wasn’t guessing your label. I was applying one. Enjoy you’re day 😁

Ah, so all systems are shit and there is no hope for a better one. You’re a nihilist!

Anyways, would be pretty cool to live in a system that discourages hoarding and excess, or at least doesn’t benefit it, rather than encouraging it. Neither capitalism nor state socialism have achieved that one.

How could you possibly!? Have you seen their nests!? LOOK AT THEIR NESTS AND SAY THAT AGAIN

That’s a fine disagreement (necessity of state/arrogance) to have, but don’t try to make up ideas about it being excessively self interested or anti-communal.

You’re still going to be argued with here but you won’t get a respectful response unless you show you’re acting in good faith.

Yeah it can also make you feel like a rail spike is being driven into your head…

Mutual Aid and community are core to the ideology. You’ve either made up your mind before even attempting to learn about something, or you’re trolling.

Lol

LMAO trolling used to be a bit more involved than simply omitting the /s…

The technical complexity of showing a chronological feed of posts from subscribed accounts? Are you asking for one to scoff at thou peasant? You might as well request a toaster without bluetooth BAHAHAHA! BEGONE!

I get it now. I was kind if skipping some context. I was saying under legal means sharing books is fine and good(not paying for it). e.g. going to a library. But you can certainly copy books and distribute them. I posit that it’s nearly always ethical to do so. Whether or not it’s legal is a different question and depends on the material in question.

The salvadoran government was significantly supported by the US during their civil war. The war lead to mass migration of Salvadorans to the US. MS-13 was originally an LA street gang that the US deported to El Salvador, an act which launched it into an international cartel. They didn’t “make their culture this way”, the US sluffed it’s own problem upon them.

This facility, built under President Nayib Bukele’s “war on gangs,” houses over 40,000 men, most of whom were arrested en masse without any process resembling justice—just tattoos, zip codes, or looking nervous.

Not just American deportees…

deleted by creator

Yes?

Did i say something anti-library or am i reading into this wrong?

Beyond missing the subtext…

I don’t actually read all that much. I’m excruciatingly slow and i don’t currently commute. Most of my reading was on public transit or camping. But the authors i like just happen to either be ok with sharing copies of their work or it’s available for free anyways. That said I’ve bought maybe twenty books in the last decade…

Textbooks from exploitative publishers especially i refuse to pay for. E.g. Wiley, pearson, McGraw-Hill, etc… As well technical publications and journals.

The great Gatsby was provided by school when i read it. All the books were in my k-12. Most the students couldn’t afford them.

The only books I’ve paid for are the ones where the author explicitly allows copy and free distribution.

Well, those and the ones that get bundled with online access way back in uni.

deleted by creator