Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]

  • 24 Posts
  • 402 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 3rd, 2020

help-circle





  • It was definitely the strongest of the three (admittedly not a high bar), largely because it had the courage to not just do complete fan service rehashing of the original trilogy again. There were some threads introduced that were somewhat interesting, but they dropped every single one of those threads for the third entry after the response from the fandom was overwhelmingly “we don’t want anything except exactly the same slop we’ve seen half a dozen times already.”







  • China Mieville’s commentary on The Communist Manifesto (it’s called A Specter Haunting) is both very accessible and very “literary” in style, and so might appeal to a book guy (it also has the full text of the Manifesto). It’s obviously not the most theoretically deep text, but that might be a strength and it does a good job contextualizing the original work in a way that’s very fun to read.

    Definitely Jakarta Method and Blackshirts and Reds. Possibly a controversial take, but I might go easy on the overly “historical” texts at first. Things like Capital are definitely essential to read, but probably not the best entry point; lots of original Marx is dense, intimidating, and requires a certain amount charitable/sympathetic reading to get beyond the dated language and examples. I’d stick to stuff that either engages mostly with contemporary (or at least latter-20th century) issues OR was written in the last 50 years at first.







  • For my climate science class, I did a back of the envelope calculation for what the per-person energy allocation would be if we took global energy production and gave each person an equal share. It was shockingly high–well over the average for even an Amerikkkan household (and that’s per person)–and significantly larger than I was expecting. That’s obviously not a perfect representation since a large chunk of that energy is getting consumed by institutional agents and the like, but it gives a nice glimpse into how unequal consumption actually is: like with everything else, a very small number of people are using mind-blowingly more than their fair share.

    I wonder what it is for water.