Professional lurker
The same company that said they’ll replace most workers with robots within 5-10 years? Lol yeah that’s not happening with this level of technological progrsss.
It’ll be as probable if they said they’ll replace the humans with summened servants from the underworld. A fairytale :)
Next he might find out the sky is blue. He’ll need a press conference to announce that as well i bet.
Yes, and it would be one of the scientists working in the extraterrestrial center of the UN. That’s not what it’s called, i forgot and I’m too lazy to look it up.
My guess though is that it would probably be the best authority to talk to aliens.
I totally agree! I think progress is the way to go, aside from death. And soul killing jobs have to die out with progress.
But the problem is i don’t think the current technological level of automation is even close enough to replace a significant enough portion of these jobs.
Because if they can, we won’t have basically all the rich assholes pay a sum in the billions in lobbying to make sure workers are always available to them on the cheap, with the least amount of protection against exploitation. They wouldn’t try to so hard to put down strikes, higher wages, unions, less working hours, job security, etc. They wouldn’t care as much because a machine would be way cheaper and never complains.
Our technology has to progress and imporve way more to make it possible. Progress that’s based on research, trial and error, investments, talent and raising talent and skill, and all kinds of things that cut down on immediate profits. Basically the antithesis to the current economical model that all those fucks are horny for.
To me this is the same as if in the middle ages a king was like “just kill all the peasants and make the wizards summon fully obedient servants to do the necessary work”. While their wizards are still trying to figure out how to take a rabbit out of a hat.
One way for me to get the push for this, is to tell them beforehand that i have something personal about myself I’d like to share with them as a close friend.
For example, i wanted to share something personal with a friend once, and i knew he’d take it very well and be supportive, but i was still super nervous to bring it up. So i texted him few days before i knew I’d see him saying something like “hey, when we meetup, I’d like to talk to you about something personal about me. It’s not bad, but it’s a face to face conversation, and it’s something I’d like to share with you :)”.
This way, i had no choice but to tell him when we met. In fact, he brought it up to me instead, making it so much easier to just “do it” like the others commented.
As they actively destroy any chance of progress in computing? Probably even degressing it by supporting the AI bubble? Good luck with having robots that can’t do more than 5% of the basics of what an average human can do :)
Sure it’ll be able to do it very “efficiently”, but that efficiency is extremely relative at best, and sacrifices way more in the background making it less efficient overall.
Too bad the people running these companies can’t see beyond their next quarterly numbers to know this, or know how business, technology, the economy, or how humans work.
It’s more ironic to think that those pissy rich people throwing a tantrum about how taxes ruin everything, yet they almost always prefer to live in high taxes places because living there is better.
The hypocrisy would be so funny if it wasn’t so harmful to most people.
Oh wow so there ARE actually some adults in the government? Suprising but nice to see. Hopefully the children don’t throw another tantrum and ruin it… Like usual
Opt-out!? Sounds like some woke shit capitalist jesus wouldn’t agree on
It’s a love story because when they get back together, they’re way happier :)
Probably same reason cancer always needs to grow. It’s a fundamentally broken part of the system.
When insecure and weak little boys are in positions of power…
Honestly, that doesn’t sound bad, as long as it’s clearly communicated and has opt-in/opt-out.
I wouldn’t mind selling some of my data that i choose consensually, and getting fairly compensated for it.
Especially when comparing that to how most (if not all) current major companies just covertly steal all they can about you and sell it behind our backs to whoever.
Saying all that, i don’t support current AI model training practices at all. So i agree (for now) with the means, not the end results.
It took me a second to realize that’s not just a fluffy hanger
I didn’t understand most of these legal sounding words. I have no idea what the conclusion of this is. So they allowed him to break the law, or stopped him again from breaking it? Can someone translate this to normal english please