Federal officials in other departments have also continued to warn Canadian Heritage that the inclusion of Nazi collaborators on the memorial would cause international embarrassment. “It is important to note that many anti-communist and anti-Soviet advocates and fighters were also active Nazi collaborators, who committed documented massacres,” Global Affairs Canada officials warned their counterparts at Canadian Heritage in 2021. Those records were obtained by the Ottawa Citizen using the access-to-information law.

  • hellinkilla [they/them, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    these poeple (archive link) submitted a slightly more whimsical concept that I almost like. Given how strongly associated pulling down statues is with the woke and the concept annoys right wingers so much. It could really put them into cognitive dissonance.

    To be fair, it is kind of a depiction of current communism. Toppling dangerously, but not yet with face planted in the ground. Hovering, somewhat miraculously, against all gravity. Offers the possibility of the statue’s level being one day corrected.

    Would this be Canada’s first Lenin statue?

    Better than listing a bunch of boneheads as though they were martyrs.

    Hey, even though he’s unpopular and it’s complicated, can we call Trotsky a victim of communism? I hope one of those cults has submitted his name so when the wall of names is unveiled scrubbed of all nazis, it will just be him.

    • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’d take it.

      I’m sure communists across the country would travel to it to take pictures of sideways Lenin.

      You could do cute montages where it looks like you are lifting Lenin back up and shit.

    • the rizzler@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      When a society’s revolutionary fervour reaches the third and highest level, infra-materialist theoreticians have postulated that the laws of physics cease to be laws.

      In some of his later writings, Nilsen himself speculated about the potential for an *extra-physical architecture* that disregards the laws of ‘bourgeois physics’ and instead relies on the revolutionary faith of the people for structural integrity.

      YOU: Meaning the buildings stay up because people *believe* they’ll stay up?

      Precisely. Nilsen observed that the financial system operates on the same principle of faith, so why not an architectural system?