yeah this is what i do to my primary doctors too

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

i thought this was about the youtuber at first

the last thing the gorpcore community needs is more newbies like you coming in who don’t understand the culture!

this one feels personal

white supremacist rally? is that what we’re calling the house of commons now?

i dont understand what people get out of defending microsoft like this

implicit assumption of men being completely incapable of basic tasks

is that truly your good faith interpretation of the message here? no thoughts on the history of sexism, the objectification of women? obviously it’s criticizing how stupid and useless men are. Oh, poor men!

how do you get angry at a poster that’s about being nice to women… honestly your comment makes it seem like you didn’t even look at it

MR SNUFFLES! YES!

ohhh it doesn’t mean “I would shake [my baby] a little” it means “I would shake [my body in fear] a little”

I was very confused

you say you are a real leftist so just must be on Hexbear

why would a leftist be hanging out with a bunch of libs?

hell no

(with intent)

maybe i genocide on accident! but not on purpose!

wait, how else have you all been breathing? am i the only one that does this?

Removed by mod

But you think it’s okay that the reviewers should waste their time reviewing slop?

fantasy world where if they simply make rules where you’re Not Allowed to submit LLM code nobody will

Maybe you can’t, but it’s very obvious in many cases.

so not all cases? don’t waste my time

very silly to be upset about this policy

Accountability: You MUST take the responsibility for your contribution: Contributing to Fedora means vouching for the quality, license compliance, and utility of your submission. All contributions, whether from a human author or assisted by large language models (LLMs) or other generative AI tools, must meet the project’s standards for inclusion. The contributor is always the author and is fully accountable for the entirety of these contributions.

Contribution & Community Evaluation: AI tools may be used to assist human reviewers by providing analysis and suggestions. You MUST NOT use AI as the sole or final arbiter in making a substantive or subjective judgment on a contribution, nor may it be used to evaluate a person’s standing within the community (e.g., for funding, leadership roles, or Code of Conduct matters). This does not prohibit the use of automated tooling for objective technical validation, such as CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or spam filtering. The final accountability for accepting a contribution, even if implemented by an automated system, always rests with the human contributor who authorizes the action.

the code is going to be held to the same standards as always, so it’s not like they’re going to be blindly adding slop

you can’t stop people from using LLMs, how would you know the difference? so formalizing the process allows for better accountability